Menu Close

Archival Transcriptions: for the public, by the public

There is a recent thread on the archives listserv that talks about transcriptions – specifically for small projects or those that have little financial support. There is even a case in which there is no easy OCR answer due to the state of the digitized microfilm records.
One of the suggestions was to use some combination of human effort to read the documents – either into a program that would transcribe them, or to another human who would do the typing. It made me wonder what it would look like to make a place online where people who wanted to could volunteer their transcription time. In the case where the records are already digitized and viewable, this seems like an interesting approach.

Something like this already exists for the genealogy world over at the USGenWeb Archives Project. They have a long list of different projects listed here. Though the interface is a bit confusing, the spirit of the effort is clear – many hands make light work. Precious genealogical resources can be digitized, transcribed and added to this archive to support the research of many by anyone – anywhere in the world.

Of course in the case of transcribing archival records there are challenges to be overcome. How do you validate what is transcribed? How do you provide guidance and training for people working from anywhere in the world? If I have figured out that a particular shape is a capital S in a specific set of documents, that could help me (or an OCR program) as I progress through the documents, but if I only see one page from a series – I will have to puzzle through that one page without the support of my past experience. Perhaps that would encourage people to keep helping with a specific set of records? Maybe you give people a few sample pages with validated translations to practice with? And many records won’t be that hard to read – easy for a human’s eye but still a challenge for an OCR program.

The optimist in me hopes that it could be a tempting task for those who want to volunteer but don’t have time to come in during the normal working day. Transcribing digitized records can be done in the middle of the night in your pajamas from anywhere in the world. Talk about increasing your pool of possible volunteers! I would think that it could even be an interesting project for high school and college students – a chance to work with primary sources. With careful design, I can even imagine providing an option to select from a preordained set of subjects or tags (or in Folksonomy friendly environment, the option to add any tags that the transcriber deems appropriate) – though that may be another topic worthy of its own exploration independent of transcription.

The initial investment for a project like this would come from building a framework to support a distributed group of volunteers. You would need an easy way to serve up a record or group of records to a volunteer and prevent duplication of effort – but this is an old problem with good solutions from the configuration management world of software development and other collaboration work environments.

It makes a nice picture in my mind – a slow, but steady, team effort to transcribe collections like the Colorado River Bed Case (2,125 pages of digitized microfilm at the University of Utah’s J. Willard Marriott Library) – mostly done from people’s homes on their personal computers in the middle of the night. A central website for managing digitized archival transcriptions could give the research community the ability to vote on the next collection that warrants attention. Admit it – you would type a page or two yourself, wouldn’t you?

Similar Posts:

Print This Post Print This Post
(Visited 30 times, 1 visits today)
Posted in access, digitization, historical research, outreach, preservation, search, transcription, what if

11 Comments

  1. Jeanne

    Thanks! Double-keying makes a lot of sense. It could easily be automated such that exact matches between the two copies could be auto-published without further human intervention.

    The Distributed Proofreaders site looks very interesting – and I love their tag line “Preserving History One Page at a Time”.

  2. Paco

    Very nice post (as the entire blog is, of course)!
    I think it could be very useful for European Archive’s Early Modern manuscript collections, as for the students of Palaeography, who could work, as you said, with primary sources. Wikipaleography? Wikitranscription? Any case, a very good idea for building the Finding Aids 2.0

  3. Pingback:Paleograf√≠a 2.0: reflexiones sobre posibles proyectos de transcripci√≥n de documentos de archivo « @rchivista

  4. Jeanne

    Paco-

    Glad you like the idea. I hope to post more on it when I have had time to think it through a bit more. I suspect that if the infrastructure were done well that the idea could support many applications. One of the more interesting problems is how to make it easy for those who submit their records for transcription to get the actual final work back into their local repository such that it is associated properly with the right original record and accessible via their local access interface.

    I wish I could read your blog as easily as you appear to read mine. I have been enjoying the international reach of my blog but I wish I could read a dozen languages (or that Babblefish or Google Translate did a better job). Ah ha – there is a neat idea! RSS feeds that are automatically translated. When I add your blog to Bloglines, one of the configuration options should be what language to translate from and to. Does this already exist?

  5. Pingback:Squirl.info - an interesting option for putting collections online - SpellboundBlog.com - ponderings of an archives student

  6. Pingback:reCAPTCHA: crowdsourcing transcription comes to life - SpellboundBlog.com - spellbound by archival science and information technology in the digital age

  7. Pingback:LOC + Flickr equals Crowdsourced Tagging - SpellboundBlog.com - spellbound by archival science and information technology in the digital age

  8. Pingback:THATCamp » Blog Archive » Crowdsourcing Transcriptions

  9. Pingback:Early Modern Notes » Interactive digital history

  10. Pingback:Crowdsourcing Manuscript Transcription « Document

Comments are closed.