<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Edges of the GIS Electronic Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spellboundblog.com/2007/01/02/the-edges-of-the-gis-electronic-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spellboundblog.com/2007/01/02/the-edges-of-the-gis-electronic-record/</link>
	<description>Archives, Digital Humanities, Cultural Heritage, Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archivists and New Technology: When Do The Records Matter? - Spellbound Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.spellboundblog.com/2007/01/02/the-edges-of-the-gis-electronic-record/comment-page-1/#comment-9349</link>
		<dc:creator>Archivists and New Technology: When Do The Records Matter? - Spellbound Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellboundblog.com/2007/01/02/the-edges-of-the-gis-electronic-record/#comment-9349</guid>
		<description>[...] from authors. Those who worry about records captured in geographic information systems (GIS) were trying to sort out how to define a single GIS electronic record when last I dipped my toes into their corner of the world in the Fall of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from authors. Those who worry about records captured in geographic information systems (GIS) were trying to sort out how to define a single GIS electronic record when last I dipped my toes into their corner of the world in the Fall of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supporting Appraisal of Digital Records - SpellboundBlog.com - ponderings of an archives student</title>
		<link>http://www.spellboundblog.com/2007/01/02/the-edges-of-the-gis-electronic-record/comment-page-1/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>Supporting Appraisal of Digital Records - SpellboundBlog.com - ponderings of an archives student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 04:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellboundblog.com/2007/01/02/the-edges-of-the-gis-electronic-record/#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>[...] doing my research last term into the appraisal of Digital GIS records, I was amazed by how much of what was currently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] doing my research last term into the appraisal of Digital GIS records, I was amazed by how much of what was currently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spring 2007:Access and Information Visualization - SpellboundBlog.com - ponderings of an archives student</title>
		<link>http://www.spellboundblog.com/2007/01/02/the-edges-of-the-gis-electronic-record/comment-page-1/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Spring 2007:Access and Information Visualization - SpellboundBlog.com - ponderings of an archives student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 04:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spellboundblog.com/2007/01/02/the-edges-of-the-gis-electronic-record/#comment-870</guid>
		<description>[...] I can see a future in which major government and business decisions are made based on the interpretation of such interactive data models, graphs and charts. Instead of needing just the ‘records’ - don’t we need a way to recreate the experience that the original user had when interacting with the records? This (unsurprisingly) takes me back to the struggle of how to define exactly what a record is in the digital world. Is the record a still image of a final visualization? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can see a future in which major government and business decisions are made based on the interpretation of such interactive data models, graphs and charts. Instead of needing just the ‘records’ &#8211; don’t we need a way to recreate the experience that the original user had when interacting with the records? This (unsurprisingly) takes me back to the struggle of how to define exactly what a record is in the digital world. Is the record a still image of a final visualization? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

